Skip to content
November 03, 2026

Life Cycle Assessment (LCA): A Guide for Businesses

Product development

Life cycle assessment is becoming more important for many companies. This guide explains where life cycle data is required by law, which standards apply and how to approach a life cycle assessment (LCA). As of November 2026.

Greenzero LCA-Software
Reading time:

In short: There is no general obligation to carry out a life cycle assessment in the EU. However, more and more regulations require life cycle data, for example for the carbon footprint of batteries, for new buildings from 2028 and as evidence for environmental claims in advertising. After the Omnibus package, the CSRD only applies to companies with more than 1,000 employees and more than €450 million in net turnover. Suppliers still receive data requests from their customers. An LCA is carried out in accordance with ISO 14040/14044 in four steps: goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, impact assessment and interpretation.

1000

employees

and more than €450 million in net turnover: these are the CSRD thresholds after the Omnibus package.

50

tonnes per year

Above this import volume, companies have had to report embedded emissions under CBAM since 2026.

4

steps

make up a life cycle assessment according to ISO 14040/14044.

Many companies are currently looking closely at sustainability reporting and the life cycle assessment of their products and processes (LCA). This is driven both by regulatory requirements from the EU and national governments and by changing purchasing behaviour and higher expectations from customers and business partners for climate-friendly, environmentally conscious products. In addition, stricter rules for environmental claims in advertising have applied since 27 September 2026: anyone who advertises with terms such as “environmentally friendly” must be able to prove it.

An LCA is the most comprehensive way to capture the environmental impact of a product over its entire life cycle. Depending on the approach, this covers all phases, from manufacturing and packaging through use to the disposal of the product and the resources involved.

Standards and established procedures now exist for LCA. Below, we present the most common approaches. Depending on the type of product or service, one method may be more suitable than another.

If your challenge is more complex: at the end of this article, we present an example of a company that gained significant value from a custom LCA software we developed.

There is no general obligation to carry out a life cycle assessment for every product. However, several EU regulations require data that can only come from a life cycle perspective. An overview (as of November 2026):

  • Batteries: The EU Battery Regulation provides for a carbon footprint declaration, starting with electric vehicle batteries and rechargeable industrial batteries above 2 kWh. The obligation applies once the EU has adopted the corresponding calculation method.
  • Buildings: Under the recast EU Energy Performance of Buildings Directive, the global warming potential over the entire life cycle must be calculated and disclosed in the energy performance certificate: from 2028 for new buildings over 1,000 m² and from 2030 for all new buildings.
  • Sustainability reporting (CSRD): After the 2026 Omnibus package, the reporting obligation only applies to companies with more than 1,000 employees and more than €450 million in net turnover.
  • Products (Ecodesign Regulation): The EU is gradually defining, product group by product group, which environmental requirements products must meet and which information must be provided in the digital product passport.
  • Imports (CBAM): The definitive phase of the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism started in 2026. Importers of steel, aluminium, cement and other goods must report embedded emissions from 50 tonnes per year.
  • Advertising: Since 27 September 2026, generic environmental claims without proof have been prohibited.

Important for mid-sized companies: Even if you are not subject to reporting obligations yourself, large customers request environmental data from their suppliers. If you have assessed your products, you can answer these requests quickly.

For many companies, an LCA is therefore still voluntary. But more and more companies are carrying out life cycle assessments, and the risk of falling behind competitors grows if the topic is neglected. The German Environment Agency (Umweltbundesamt, in German) also highlights the benefits of life cycle assessment:

The results of Life Cycle Assessments (LCAs) can be used to optimize processes for sustainable production. They also assist in product evaluation, for example, when awarding the Blue Angel eco-label or addressing questions related to packaging legislation.
Umweltbundesamt (Federal Environment Agency), Germany

Why Should Companies Conduct an LCA?

A life cycle assessment helps companies improve their environmental performance and operate more sustainably in the long term. The following reasons speak in favour of carrying out an LCA.

  • Reporting obligations and customer requests
    The CSRD, CBAM, the Battery Regulation and the Ecodesign Regulation require environmental data, either from you directly or via your customers. A life cycle assessment provides the data basis for this.
  • Identifying potential for optimisation
    LCAs help identify hidden environmental impacts along the entire value chain. Companies can make processes more efficient, save resources and reduce costs in the long term.
  • Improving competitiveness
    Customers and business partners increasingly value transparency and sustainability. Companies that can make specific, verifiable environmental claims about their products improve their market opportunities and strengthen their image.
  • Driving innovation
    Analysing environmental impacts reveals weaknesses in product design that can lead to innovation. Companies develop new, more sustainable products as a result.
  • Long-term cost savings
    Conserving resources not only benefits the environment but also lowers operating costs. Less material use and more efficient processes lead to long-term savings.
  • Risk reduction
    Companies that know and reduce their environmental impact minimise risks related to future environmental legislation and rising raw material costs.
  • Support for certification
    Environmental certifications such as ISO 14001 or the EU Ecolabel require a basic understanding of environmental impacts. A life cycle assessment provides the necessary data and supports the certification process.

There are many good reasons for an LCA. In summary: by carrying out a life cycle assessment, companies take an important step towards greater sustainability while securing long-term economic benefits.

Research: life cycle assessment as early as product development

Since September 2026, we have been working with the Institute for Machine Elements and Systems Engineering (MSE) at RWTH Aachen University on a research project that aims to make sustainability analyses possible in the early phases of product development. The focus is on linking model-based systems engineering (MBSE) and life cycle assessment. The goal is a methodology and software solution that enables companies to integrate sustainability aspects into their development processes early on and make well-founded decisions while the product can still be changed easily. The project is funded by the German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy as part of the Central Innovation Programme for SMEs (ZIM).

More about the project launch: MSE post on LinkedIn (in German)

LCA According to Standards: DIN EN ISO 14040/14044

The standards ISO 14040 and 14044 are the international standard for carrying out life cycle assessments (LCA). Both date from 2006 and were amended in 2017 and 2020. They ensure that LCAs are carried out consistently and transparently, regardless of which product or process is being assessed. These standards give companies a reliable method for evaluating environmental impacts and make different studies comparable.

  • Goal and scope definition: In this first step, the purpose and scope of the study are defined. This includes which life cycle phases (e.g. raw material extraction, production, transport, use, disposal) are considered and which environmental impacts are analysed. Depending on the use case, it may make sense to look at different life cycle phases.
  • Life cycle inventory (LCI): This is where data is collected. All inputs (raw materials, energy and water) and outputs (emissions, waste, wastewater) over the entire life cycle of the product are recorded. This data forms the basis for the further analysis.
  • Life cycle impact assessment (LCIA): The collected data is converted into environmental impacts. This includes assessing effects on various impact categories such as climate change (CO2), ozone depletion, acidification or eutrophication.
  • Interpretation: In the final step, the results are summarised, interpreted and evaluated against the defined goals. This results in recommendations for reducing negative environmental impacts.

ISO 14040/14044 ensure that all steps of an LCA are transparent and consistent. Following these standards ensures that results are scientifically sound and comparable. LCA software can be used for all four steps.

Brief Overview: Further Norms and Laws for Measuring Environmental Impacts

In the coming years, companies will increasingly face the challenge of complying with LCA norms and legal frameworks to demonstrate their environmental responsibility. In this section, we briefly explain other standards, norms, and laws that are directly or indirectly relevant for sustainability reporting and life cycle assessments or that impact these processes.

The EU Energy Efficiency Directive was recast in 2023. Its goal is to reduce the EU's final energy consumption by at least 11.7% by 2030 compared with the 2020 reference projections. Member states must set and implement national contributions to achieve this.

What is new is that obligations for companies are based on energy consumption rather than company size: companies consuming more than 10 TJ (around 2.8 GWh) per year must carry out an energy audit, and those consuming more than 85 TJ (around 23.6 GWh) must have an energy management system. This means mid-sized companies can be affected too.

In short: the directive sets the framework, while national law defines the specific obligations for companies.

More information: European Commission on the Energy Efficiency Directive

In response to the EU Energy Efficiency Directive, Germany passed the Energy Efficiency Act (Energieeffizienzgesetz, EnEfG) in 2023. It creates a cross-sector framework for increasing energy efficiency. Companies with high energy consumption must introduce energy or environmental management systems. In 2026, the German government initiated an amendment to align the act with the recast EU directive.

In short: the EnEfG sets energy efficiency requirements for the federal government, the federal states and companies. It does not require a life cycle assessment, but the energy data it requires feeds into every LCA.

Further information can be found in the press release on the Energy Efficiency Act (in German).

The Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) requires companies to report on sustainability, including their greenhouse gas emissions. With the Omnibus package, the EU significantly narrowed its scope in 2026: only companies with more than 1,000 employees and more than €450 million in net turnover are now subject to reporting. Listed small and medium-sized enterprises are exempt.

Important for suppliers: companies subject to reporting may only request information from smaller partners in their value chain within the scope of the voluntary EU standard. The requests still come, and a life cycle assessment provides the data for them.

In short: the CSRD now directly affects only very large companies, but indirectly also their suppliers.

More information: European Commission on corporate sustainability reporting

The Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) is a non-profit organisation that provides a framework for transparent reporting on environmental, climate and sustainability data. The GRI framework is used and recognised worldwide. You can use this standard, but it is not mandatory. In 2025, GRI published new standards on climate change (GRI 102) and energy (GRI 103), which take effect on 1 January 2027. The new standard on biodiversity (GRI 101) has applied since 2026.

In short: a framework that can help with reporting the results of a life cycle assessment.

More information: a good summary is available from the sustainability experts at Sunhat (in German).

PAS 2050, the GHG Protocol and ISO 14067 are standards for measuring greenhouse gas emissions. The GHG Protocol is mainly used to determine the carbon footprint of companies. PAS 2050 (last revised in 2011) and ISO 14067 determine the carbon footprint of products or services. ISO and the GHG Protocol are currently working on a joint standard for product footprints.

None of these standards is a complete life cycle assessment. An LCA provides important data for the carbon footprint but usually covers far more environmental impacts than greenhouse gas emissions alone.

In short: these are standards for measuring greenhouse gas emissions for companies, products and services.

More information: Standards for calculating the carbon footprint – a comparison of PAS 2050, GHG Protocol and ISO 14067 (in German)

The Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation has been in force since July 2024. It allows the EU to set requirements for durability, reparability, recyclability and environmental impact for individual product groups. Which information manufacturers must provide is defined per product group in separate legal acts and made available via the digital product passport. The first product groups prioritised by the European Commission in its 2025 working plan include iron and steel, aluminium, textiles, furniture, tyres and mattresses.

In short: for more and more products, environmental data is becoming part of the product information, and a life cycle assessment is the way to determine it.

Since 27 September 2026, the EU Directive on Empowering Consumers for the Green Transition (EmpCo) has applied. Among other things, it prohibits generic environmental claims such as “environmentally friendly” without proven environmental performance, claims that a product is climate neutral based on offsetting, and sustainability labels that are not based on a certification scheme or established by public authorities. The complementary Green Claims Directive, by contrast, is currently on hold.

In short: anyone advertising environmental benefits needs robust data, for example from a life cycle assessment.

The EU Energy Performance of Buildings Directive, recast in 2024, requires that a building's global warming potential over its entire life cycle be calculated and disclosed in the energy performance certificate. This applies from 2028 to new buildings with a useful floor area of more than 1,000 m² and from 2030 to all new buildings.

In short: for new buildings, a life cycle view of greenhouse gas emissions becomes mandatory.

The definitive phase of the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) started on 1 January 2026. Anyone importing goods such as steel, aluminium, cement or fertilisers into the EU must report the emissions embedded in them. Since a simplification in 2025, this applies from an import volume of 50 tonnes per year.

In short: CBAM makes emissions data along the supply chain mandatory for importers.

Case study

GREENZERO

Find out how we helped GREENZERO to efficiently assess environmental impacts. Read our detailed case study and see how our custom software can advance your sustainability projects.

The Assessment Framework: What Types of LCAs Are There?

There are various approaches to conducting a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), depending on which part of a product's or process's life cycle you want to evaluate. The most common methods are Cradle to Grave, Cradle to Cradle, and Gate to Gate. These approaches primarily differ in how comprehensive the analysis is and which life cycle phases are covered.

Cradle to Grave

The Cradle to Grave approach examines the entire life cycle of a product, from "cradle" to "grave." This means every step is analyzed, from raw material extraction to production and usage, all the way through to disposal. This method provides a complete overview of environmental impacts and highlights where the greatest savings potential exists along the product's life cycle.

Cradle to Cradle

The Cradle to Cradle approach goes a step further. It also analyzes the entire life cycle but with the goal of returning the product to the cycle after its use phase. The focus here is on designing materials and resources so that they can be reused or recycled after use, without generating waste. The concept is based on a circular economy, where there is no "grave," and products continuously flow into new production processes.

Cradle to Gate

Cradle to Gate is a partial view of the product life cycle. It analyzes the product’s life cycle from raw material extraction ("Cradle") up to the point where it leaves the factory ("Gate"). The usage and disposal phases of the product are not included in this approach. It is often used when companies want to assess only the production process without considering the subsequent phases.

Gate to Gate

The Gate to Gate approach focuses on a specific section of the life cycle, particularly the processes within a specific production step or company area. This partial analysis can be useful for evaluating the environmental impacts of a single production process without considering the product’s full life cycle. Gate to Gate is often applied when companies want to optimize individual production steps.

Gate to Grave

The Gate to Grave approach focuses only on the usage and disposal phases of a product. It begins when the product leaves the factory ("Gate") and ends with its disposal ("Grave"). This approach is used to concentrate on the environmental impacts after the product’s manufacturing, such as energy consumption during use or its recyclability at the end of its life.

Well to Wheel

This method is commonly used in the energy and transport sectors. Well to Wheel considers the entire energy flow of a system, from raw material extraction (e.g., oil extraction) to use (e.g., combustion in a vehicle engine). It is a specialized form of LCA mainly applied to evaluate fuels or energy carriers, focusing on efficiency and environmental impacts throughout the entire energy chain.

Well to Tank

Well to Tank is a part of the Well to Wheel approach, focusing on the environmental impacts of fuel supply, from raw material extraction up until the moment the fuel reaches the vehicle tank. In this approach, the upstream energy production is evaluated without considering the actual use in the end product.

Each of these methods serves specific purposes and helps businesses analyze various aspects of the life cycle. Depending on the objectives of the analysis and the processes to be optimized, it may be useful to choose one of the above-mentioned approaches or even combine several methods.

Life Cycle Inventory: Challenging Data Volumes and Data Gaps

Once you have defined the goal and scope of the life cycle assessment, the next step is the inventory analysis, in which the required data is collected. Several challenges arise along the way. One of the biggest is the immense amount of data that has to be collected and managed. New measurements also often have to be added later. For new products, data gaps frequently occur because certain substances or process steps are not yet included in common environmental databases.

In such cases, secondary data from comparable products or processes is often used. Usage data, such as the lifetime or disposal of a product, is also often not directly available for new products. Estimates, scenarios or mathematical models are frequently used to fill in the missing information.

For comparing products, the European Commission has also recommended its own method, the Product Environmental Footprint (PEF).

Two LCA approaches can be used for the inventory analysis: a screening LCA or a scientific LCA.

Screening LCA: The Fast, Efficient Approach

A Screening LCA is a simplified method aimed at quickly providing an initial overview of the environmental impacts of a product or process. This option is particularly suitable when time is limited or when a first assessment of optimization potential is needed. Secondary data or averages are often used instead of extensive data collection, allowing potential environmental "hotspots" to be identified quickly.

However, this comes at the cost of accuracy, as the Screening LCA is primarily intended for rough preliminary assessments, and the results are not as precise as those obtained from detailed analyses.

Scientific LCA: The More Accurate, Scientific Approach

In contrast, the Scientific LCA provides a comprehensive and precise analysis. Here, as much primary data as possible is gathered to assess the environmental impacts in detail. This method is more complex and time-consuming, as it requires the full collection of all relevant substances and processes. LCA consultants use various mathematical models to calculate missing values. Working with LCA consultants is essential to close the gaps in environmental databases and still obtain the most accurate results possible.

The advantage of this method is significantly higher accuracy, making it indispensable for scientific research and robust findings. It provides reliable results that can serve as the basis for strategic decisions or certified environmental labels.

Individual Cases: Improving LCA Processes with Custom Solutions

The Life Cycle Inventory (LCI) is the most complex part of an LCA. To complete it, various LCA software tools are available that assist with data collection and analysis. These tools are connected to environmental databases and can access existing data sets.

However, the more detailed the LCI needs to be and the more complex the products and production chains are, the harder it becomes to manage the LCI using standard LCA software.

Challenges with LCA Software

  • Standard software often cannot meet the highly specific needs of individual companies.
  • They are designed for broad, cross-industry use. Frequently, these tools are built for either highly qualified LCA consultants or the end customer, but not both user groups.

Custom LCA Software

For a large drugstore chain, we developed specialised LCA software to comprehensively assess the environmental impact of its products.

The software records environmental impacts along the entire value chain and presents them transparently. Automated processes significantly reduce the effort of manual data collection and analysis, saving both time and money. In addition, the user-friendly interface allows different stakeholders and environmental databases to be integrated, further increasing the accuracy and efficiency of the life cycle assessment.

More about our services: Custom LCA software

Frequently asked questions about life cycle assessment

There is no general obligation. However, individual regulations require life cycle data: the EU Battery Regulation a carbon footprint declaration for certain batteries, the EU buildings directive the global warming potential of new buildings from 2028, and the Ecodesign Regulation environmental information for individual product groups in the future. Anyone making environmental claims in advertising must be able to substantiate them since 27 September 2026.

A product's carbon footprint, for example according to ISO 14067, only considers greenhouse gas emissions. A life cycle assessment according to ISO 14040/14044 also evaluates other environmental impacts such as acidification, eutrophication or ozone depletion.

Only companies with more than 1,000 employees and more than €450 million in net turnover. Both criteria must be met. Companies subject to reporting may only request information from smaller suppliers within the scope of the voluntary EU standard.

For standard cases, there are LCA software tools connected to environmental databases. For complex products, many variants or your own data sources, they often reach their limits. In that case, custom LCA software that adapts to your processes is worthwhile.

* This article is for general information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The information reflects the status as of November 2026 and has been carefully researched. However, we cannot guarantee that it is complete or up to date. Please check which requirements apply to your company in your specific case.

Greenzero LCA-Software
Custom LCA software for your life cycle assessment
Standard software doesn't fit your products or processes? We develop LCA software tailored precisely to your data and workflows.
Explore LCA software